
There was a time when to every machine that processed piles of data a Mac was attached, while the writing room was the dominion of the PC.
Myth (noun):
1. a traditional story
2. a widely held but false belief/a misrepresentation of the truth
There was this story about the reality distortion field that his Steveness can create to afflict the minds of people that watch him perform. The ugly truth is: Microsoft somehow managed to create something similar… Unlike Apple’s CEO they do not enhance their appearance (PCs are still mostly piles of ugly plastic) but rather alter the perception of the average PC user concerning Apple… just similar to the first sentence above, BigM. is somehow using the same arguments to defend its case for a decade now. I am sick of hearing these things over and over again - let me demystify you!
Myth#1 - Macs are specialist tools: Some lab equipment is still connected to sturdy G4s running OS9.22. Coming from PCs, people are bumping against a wall of ignorance that purposefully was meant to force people to “think different”. One button on the mouse only, the system structure completely enigmatic to someone being used to such intuitive things as C: being the system drive ;-)… Comparing the current cat with 9.2.2 You can hardly determine that it is the same operating system. What I hear most from people is the opinion perfectly describing OS9 while being ignorant about the development at apple.
In my opinion and experience I was fine with every task I was trying to do on a mac - not a single one needs to be performed in a windows environment! Time coming in this section here at Mactropolis I will review pieces of software that especially help you tackle the daily lab routine, so stay tuned and flood me with questions, please. My daring statement is: you will not need Windows on your Mac for doing your lab work, there’s an answer for everything to tackle! Moreover, some things you’d even PREFER to do on your Mac!
Myth#2 - Macs are only nice but pricy hardware: this is something I can agree upon at first - Macs are pricier than the usual desktop or notebook you buy - be it used or not. And this should make your scientifically trained synapses work. Not only does the company sell the stuff for a lot of cash, the used ones also are VERY stable in price while request is there. This could be because Mac users treat their stuff better…but on average you know mankind enough to tell that this can’t be it. Still, you pay a lot for design you say?
In my opinion: DO NOT LOSE your scientific instinct when it comes to Computers - give it an unbiased look and feel.
Wandering through the notebook sections of the big malls I see myself confronted with one material, predominantly: plastic- sorry IBM and sony, ENFORCED plastic. Now lay your hand on a Macbook pro - feel the reassuring coolness of the aluminium? This is not a mere design artifact, this is built to last! And I can speak for my sturdy Powerbook at least that where my previous notebooks lost the occasional edge of plastic frame, the aluminium just does not care. Nothing moves if it’s not supposed to. Form is not only for the sake of form like it is, but for a reason you might not have experienced yet.
But actually, this argument bothers me if it comes from a scientist or any other person looking for optimal performance. You don’t judge the quality of something by the mere looks. This leads to no longer comparing Macs and PCs on the looks level (let us assume that you do not detest the design on sight), but on the output level. Let me point out some things that were eye-openers for me, as small as they may seem:
1. Ever wondered how a life without viruses would be? Not worrying about connecting anywhere abroad still is perfect peace on a Mac.
2. You open the laptop, it is READY TO START WORKING in seconds - this still amazes me every time i am opening my Mac!
3. Restarts are “one time a week” - events, because installing and deinstalling does not require you to do so.
4. Since I am using my Mac the error is sitting in front of the Computer. A hard lesson at first this creates an indispensable trust in the system itself - VERY relaxing…
Myth#3 - My special software is not available on the Mac: This is the main issue most people have- you depend on exchange everywhere, not only in science. So in PC world you have all you need in a neat collection, so why change the running system?
In my opinion: I remember this ad from IBM - they showed one of those “computers” from the sixties filling half a bureau… subscripted with “never change a running system”… made me smile too, but it answers the previous “why”: to improve the current situation. And this is what happens if you dare… I don’t say trust me, I just want you to do a real comparison… All you really need is someone who asked this question and had an answer - thanks to the Mayor we have a forum now!
Nowadays you can make the switch by running a copy of Windows in parallel… either emulated or bootcamped… you can take your sweet time… but trust me I am right
Let me shoot back a question at you: what is the MAIN exchange format for information? I would say it is pdf before word, but others won’t. To have a native pdf generator has proven to be indispensible. No problems, no software to install, you wanna show someone what you have, print it as pdf and send it, print it as hard copy or present it to an audience - the looks will not be altered, period! Just as you would expect it to work.
Finally, the point for me is not to give complete for and againsts. Since I found my solution already, mentioning anything else here would be pointless. What I want to do here from now on is give a perspective to work better on a Mac. No matter whether you own one, plan to own one, or whether this is your first curious contact with the idea.
It is easy for you, being a scientist - depending on what you’re best at - compare and aim for quality - there will be no way of avoiding the Mac.
written by madmacmat \\ tags: Macs in Science







January 31st, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Good comments, but what a person really needs in order to change is to have an open mind. I don’t see that happening much.
February 4th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
While apples are expensive they are not overpriced. In a feature by feature comparison they’re within a few dollars of comparable dells.
February 4th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
So, how DO I safely hook my Mac up to lab equipment like radioactivity counters, spectrographic analyzers, micro-scales, oxygen uptake sensors, radio receivers, gene sequencers, etc.?
February 5th, 2008 at 12:18 am
“Time coming in this section here at Mactropolis”
Can I assume English is a second language for you?
February 5th, 2008 at 12:23 am
Well, you could try National Instruments Labview Hardware (USB, GPIB, Serial, Firewire or even LAN), or you could use a bluetooth controller (assuming the instrument end has a serial connection).
Yeah, you may need to write some code, or get a tame programmer to do this for you - but its not impossible - and more companies are releasing drivers all the time.
Ocean Optics (for example) do a fantastic USB spectrometer, with OSX software as a starter for 10.
February 5th, 2008 at 5:07 am
Hi,
I’d direct people to http://macresearch.org/ if you really want to get started. There are a mass of options. Also all the Linux based stuff pretty much runs on OS X and X windows so that adds to the arsenal. Python (scipy) is fairly amazing. There are a lot of tools out there. Some labs here are almost entirely mac based, some are entirely windows based and some are entirely linux based. Others mix and match. Often it’s historical presendent that sets a labs computer base and until a dedicated student comes along and assembles something new the presendent sticks. There is nothing wrong with using any of these platforms to do your work. After all it’s not what platform your on but your results which matter.
February 5th, 2008 at 11:27 am
Good points, Burly!
I would add that the speed and ease to obtain your results matters most. The Mac in its current incarnation happens to encapsulate in one platform good performance, a solid Unix base and resulting access to hardcore scientific applications, ease of use at the desktop level, good integration into the world of desktop PCs, and above all a clean system design. This results in a nice work flow and makes it therefore a very productive scientific workstation.
That’s quite unlike the mess which characterizes current Linux PCs at the desktop level. And even more unlike the inscrutable black box which is the OS internals and many applications of Windows PCs. And before someone flames me: I use and support both of these latter platforms, but hate them with a passion for their shortcomings. The Mac simply lets me get my work done.
Not that I am a Mac zealot. If there’s ever a better platform and Macs start to lag behind, I will move on. Just like I’ve done previously with VAX VMS, SUNs and SGIs. But right now (computing) life is good.
February 5th, 2008 at 7:09 pm
humm, very nice, folks, thanks for the valuable comments! in detail:
@Wayne: Yessir, second language, sir! In spite of the ugly blot on my shirt You uncovered I will strive for perfection, english being not only my daily bread as a scientist but my passion language- wise…
@jgo: I am not sure I got You right- in terms of making the primary readout I think it’s the least amount of hassle to take what’s connected and running the software predestined to do the job- in contrast to the processing part where for almost any data there’s an open source solution for Your Mac. There are exceptions to this, MicroManager being one: this opensource software connects to Your fluorescence microscope and is actually designed to take over the control- it proves very fruitful to very naively search the the net for a solution, just as Burly pointed out…
finally, I couldn’t find better words than christoph rounding up things… thank You for being in the City, all of You!